Clemence Dane and Good Housekeeping
Modernity and Common Reading
The first full study of Clemence Daneās literary criticism for Good Housekeeping.
Clemence Dane and Good Housekeeping: Modernity and Common Reading examines Daneās tenure as a literary critic for Good Housekeeping between 1923 and 1933, firmly locating it within a vibrant interwar periodical culture. By expressing confidence in a shared literary heritage, modelling enjoyment of a wide variety of literature and linking womenās reading habits to the revitalisation of national literary culture, Daneās serial essays implicitly challenged academic and modernist approaches to literature. Moreover, Daneās monthly book pages, in dialogue with book authors and with other feminist contributors, fulfilled and exceeded Good Housekeepingās mission by preparing women for their new responsibilities as British citizens. Daneās journalism sheds new light on the heterogeneity intrinsic to quality domestic magazines and the roles they played in fostering womenās multi-faceted modern identities. Stella Deen demonstrates that Daneās corpus of Good Housekeeping essays makes a significant contribution to the conceptualisation of the common reader and to the history of twentieth-century literary criticism.
Original: $32.33
-70%$32.33
$9.70Description
Modernity and Common Reading
The first full study of Clemence Daneās literary criticism for Good Housekeeping.
Clemence Dane and Good Housekeeping: Modernity and Common Reading examines Daneās tenure as a literary critic for Good Housekeeping between 1923 and 1933, firmly locating it within a vibrant interwar periodical culture. By expressing confidence in a shared literary heritage, modelling enjoyment of a wide variety of literature and linking womenās reading habits to the revitalisation of national literary culture, Daneās serial essays implicitly challenged academic and modernist approaches to literature. Moreover, Daneās monthly book pages, in dialogue with book authors and with other feminist contributors, fulfilled and exceeded Good Housekeepingās mission by preparing women for their new responsibilities as British citizens. Daneās journalism sheds new light on the heterogeneity intrinsic to quality domestic magazines and the roles they played in fostering womenās multi-faceted modern identities. Stella Deen demonstrates that Daneās corpus of Good Housekeeping essays makes a significant contribution to the conceptualisation of the common reader and to the history of twentieth-century literary criticism.











